With the end of May comes what I used to call The Silly Season. That is, it is the start of political campaigns for primary elections, which then lead to run-offs, then ramping up to the big election in November and culminating with the court challenges afterward. It is an unending series of campaign meet & greets, baby-kissings, promises-made and, on occasion, lies-told. It is the time of political slogans and promises. Interestingly, the slogan “A chicken in every pot” is wrongly attributed to Herbert Hoover; it is much more of an evergreen, going back to Henry IV of France. Some things in politics never change….
Given the serious condition of our Great Republic these days, it seems inappropriate to call this one the silly season. Even though one Democratic candidate for Governor is calling for mandatory negotiations for those about to lose their homes and the hiring of more teachers and giving them more pay. Clearly a populist play, it must be music to the ears of the Georgia Association of Educators; more members and higher wages, too. Yet, as pointed out in some of my earlier posts, there is a serious concern about in our land. And a concern that solutions be reached to address the problems that beset us. The electorate is restive.
Toward that end, there are a number of candidates running for the U. S. Congress position in the 4th District of Georgia, both Republican and Democrat. Presumably, the Socialist Workers Party will be fielding a candidate, too. In any case, there are four people running in the Republican primary to be the anointed candidate. Cory Ruth is one such candidate.
The District
For a series of years, the 4th Congressional District was represented by one Cynthia McKinney. This, of course, provided me with a great source for political writing. McKinney obviously satisfied the political yearnings of some voters of the 4th District, but not at this end of the District. It was rare to see her in this area, and usually she was there just long enough to have her photograph taken with white people in her vicinity for a campaign brochure before she returned to the fortress of the south end of the 4th. Over the years, the 4th District has been gerrymandered in such a way that it is a “safe” seat for Democrats, but given the uncertainties of this election cycle, that may not remain the case.
In any case, our end of the 4th District does not see its elected Congressional representative very often. The current occupant of the 4th District seat actually appeared in our area on at least two occasions, but one does wonder what the south end of the District thinks about us since we are this white bastion in a largely black District. I’m sure that there must be some cutesy name such as Indian Country or the DMZ, but I choose to call it the Brookhaven Free State, a name which is not likely to catch on because it requires too much explanation.
The Meeting
On Tuesday, the 25th of May, I sat in at a Cory Ruth meet & greet at a nearby coffee house. Library Coffee has become the place for such political gatherings since they are conveniently located, serve good coffee and good food and have a large table in the center of the room which acts like the kitchen table in a private home. It’s an interesting venue, although the acoustics are miserable, which make hearing the candidate’s words often a difficult process. This may actually work to the candidate’s advantage.
This gathering was attended by nine people from the 4th District. Several were neighbors of mine, people I know, while others were from other places in the District. These nine people are also an indication of the general problem with the electorate, an absence of interest in the political process. They are the small core group of people that are interested in the primary election and were actually willing to come out on a Tuesday night to be informed. This is probably just as well, not only because of the room’s acoustics but also the small number of people allowed all to actively participate.
It is common currency in some quarters to describe the electorate as being stupid, but you would never know that based on the discussion. Not that there’s not plenty of anecdotal evidence to support that opinion, but the people gathered that night were thoughtful, sincere and interested. It was a lot closer to Rockwell’s painting Freedom of Speech than a SEIU demonstration. But it always comes down to what questions to ask.
The late Cathy Bennett, who was a jury consultant, had the well considered opinion that you could ask a specific question during the jury voir dire process that would tell you everything which you needed to know about a potential juror’s state of mind as it related to your legal case. She would study the case and come up with the appropriate questions. The big question could be something as simple as “Which would you choose, vanilla ice cream or Neopolitan?” and the answer would give you a reasonable idea as to how a juror would consider your case. The political vetting process is not nearly so well developed, but there are some common questions.
The Questions
As Mr. Ruth was enumerating his background and qualifications, I found myself wondering just exactly how does one go about shopping for a new Congressman? The voters’ guides from the League of Women Voters and other sources mostly detail the biographies of the candidates and note any prominent events (good or bad). There is no eBay feedback, there is no Consumers Union to extensively test the candidates in a laboratory environment. The standards of truth don’t necessarily apply to political speech, no matter how hard Congress tries. In short, obtaining the correct Congressman is a difficult process, one that is further complicated by the fact that what I would like is not necessarily what you would like. It all comes down to a question of voter volume, so it is the potential Congressperson’s goal to say as much as possible about as little as possible. You say a lot of words so that you have people’s rapt attention while saying as little as possible so that you do not become ensnared in controversy. Certainly questions of background experience are worthy, and the questions from our little group were thoughtful.
When asked about his abilities to conduct the people’s business, he fell back on the successful businessman model. That is, “I enhanced production by 20%” sort of stuff that sounds impressive until you realize that government is a not-for-profit operation and that we should have it no other way. Consider it in the same context as to why we do not pay police officers commissions for issuing traffic citations. However well intended such an idea might be, it opens up a gamut of unintended consequences. Likewise, our governments don’t necessarily operate like business in the first place.
On the other hand, the subject of the National Debt came up and $13 Trillion is pretty hard to ignore. At one side of our gathering, the daughter of one of the participants played with a doll. As we talked about the debt, I wondered what sort of world we were creating for her. As someone who often measures things by examining a balance sheet and profit & loss statement to gain a measure as to how effective an institution is, I again realize just how abstract things have become.
Viewing governments by private enterprise standards sets you up for depression. Not only does government ignore GAAP whenever it feels like it, it keeps things off the books and hides them in a variety of ways that, if they were private individuals, would get them under the RICO statutes. Also, we expect things from government that we would never reasonably expect from any private enterprise entity, not at least without paying substantially for it. And in the Norman Rockwell world, government serves as the referee for our Great Republic. At least until things get so out of balance that the voters have to intervene. As it is today.
Certainly the responses to our questions were also meant to show off the candidate’s conservative credentials and skills. Consider the group he was addressing. The subject of abortion came up, as it inevitably does, and with the usual result. This topic is so hot, and it is so closely held on a personal basis by just about everybody, that discussion of the subject is moot.
You can talk about it all you want, but changing other people’s minds on the subject is an entirely different matter. It is an emotional subject, and discussion about it is an effective way to end discussion about a lot of other things. In the case of Alan Keyes, his single mindedness on the subject served to move him to the political periphery. Not only did he lose political traction by this, but the United States also lost an eloquent conservative voice. He’s still around, of course, but how many people are listening?
In point of fact, conservatism has lost several voices in recent years, most notably William F. Buckley. What has remained are the echos of the past. It is not helped by the fact that when two or more conservatives gather together, they find themselves sputtering about a time when the Republican Party held both houses of Congress and the White House, all at the same very time. All this did was set the stage for even more profligate spending by the Tax & Spend Party; of course, these days, how can you tell? For the moment, the Republicans main claim to fame is that they’re not the Democrats, which serves to explain the Tea Party Movement, which has filled a political vacuum.
The Wrap-up
I begged off from the meeting after about and hour and a half. I have not decided to vote for Mr. Ruth or any others, if for no other reason than the fact that for the last forty years, I have voted in the Democratic primary. This dates back to the halcyon days of Bo Calloway and a time when there was little if any action in the Republican primaries of the 1960’s or 1970’s. These were also the days of “Jimmy Who?“, but I digress. Of course, now things are decidedly different.
In addition to the four Republican candidates for the 4th District Congressional post, there are three in the Democratic primary, too. Hank Johnson is the incumbent, the one who finally ejected the combative Cynthia McKinney. Connie Stokes is there, too, along with the former Mr. CEO, Vernon Jones. I know Vernon Jones, believe me, I know him. So, it becomes a question as to where my vote is best cast.
Corey Ruth did ring my chimes a few times:
- Mr. Ruth pointed out that his goal was not to make government more efficient but to get government out of our lives. His motivation is that a massive government presence in people’s lives interferes with their ability to be successful. Needless to say, this is a major tenet of conservative thought and a worthy one. The more dependent we are on government, the more its power grows and with that growth of power comes more interference in our day to day lives. The person who pays the piper calls the tune. In other words, we have focused on program efficiencies at the loss of individual autonomy.
- Corey Ruth lives in the south end of DeKalb County, the heart of political power in the 4th District. By being there, and attending churches there, he believes that he is well connected and aware of community issues. In many ways, this is a call-back to the earlier days of political governance in 1960’s Atlanta, where the white majority politicians governed with the consent of the black minority. Now, of course, the shoe is on the other foot, but it is interesting that he seeks input from the northern end of the District.
- Mr. Ruth grew up with computer technology. He came of age “When Windows 95 came out“. I’ll leave judgment of whether or not this is a good idea for another time, but that’s the way of the future regardless.
Mr. Ruth’s manner is relaxed and informal, but one thing bothered me initially. From time to time, his words were awkward and he would back up a word or two and then re-speak. After a while, I began to realize that the problem that I was having is the popular expectation that our political candidates should be like polished television anchors. This erroneous notion confuses clear speaking for clear thinking.
In recent memory, we have had at least two smooth talking black men elected to office, one at the County level and the other at the National level. In both cases, their words have been calm and self-assured, leading the voters to believe that the candidate was qualified for the office. As it turns out, what was promised was different from what was delivered. People have the expectations of complete control by their elected leaders, and the smooth talk assured them. But when the rubber meets the road, their governance has not been nearly as smooth or polished. It was yet another example of political candidates being marketed as a box of soap rather than as a real human being who wants to control people’s lives.
Cory Ruth calls Asbury Park, New Jersey as his hometown, and describes it as being “pretty rough“. I called a friend who is from New Jersey to verify that claim, and he said that it is “pretty true in several areas“. I hung up and he called back a minute later, telling me “Of course, that’s where Bruce Springsteen got his start.”
Given the rough & tumble character of DeKalb County politics, maybe we’re on to something here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.